jane austen was so lit because she wrote about men the way men typically write about women i.e. her stories just centered around women and men were only there for the sake of women, and her books could have been all bitter and sad about the state of women in that century, but instead they’re sweet honest observational stories of friendship, family and love *sighs* what a lady i am sorry i ever doubted you cos I was bored in high school
no seriously her books do not pass the REVERSE bechdel test and it’s perfect
Jane Austen never wrote a single scene without a woman present.
honestly I know enough has been said about those posts that end with the entire bus applauding someone, but like it’s just SO unbelievable?? in my experience if anything of note at all happens on public transport we all just kind of quietly look around at each other with this expression
ikr. the most mind-boggling thing these girls post is that they seem 100% convinced that trans women are “men” who want to infiltrate feminism or something like that. which is?? preposterous at best?? or they see trans men as just poor misguided lesbians corrupted by the Male Power or some shit. man i’ve honestly tried to see their side of things and there’s even some interesting ideas in a couple of their works but it’s just. god it’s so surrounded by shit
some of the nice lesbians from the college league i’m part of befriended me on facebook
everything was ok and nice until they start sharing those rly rly transphobic radfem posts lmao it was p terrible
EY FATTY BOOM BOOM 